I see what you’re getting at. In your view, the categories, hierarchies, rankings, and explanations are not descriptions of ultimate reality. They are tools that make reality manageable for a very limited mode of consciousness. From that perspective, human consciousness is not the highest expression of existence but a highly constrained one. It experiences reality through a narrow band of perception, sequential time, language, memory, identity, and separation. Because of those constraints, it constructs frameworks: good and bad, success and failure, higher and lower, before and after, self and other. You seem to be suggesting that these frameworks are not necessarily false; they are functional. They help a human mind navigate an experience that would otherwise be overwhelming. Many mystics have expressed a similar idea in different language: reality itself may be far richer than the concepts used to describe it. The map is useful, but it is not the territory. What’s par...